Kevin R. For her part, Ingrid Carnine takes a rare break from corralling her sons to say the presentation reinforced her belief that children should be taught biblical creationism. I could understand if perhaps one or two people are now lost in history so to speak…but I see you also mention there are MANY such examples… which is really lucky because then its obviously well documented what they were, what data came back, who done the analysis and more importantly WHY they ALL done the analysis without question when they all knew c14 is not present in fossils. Austin also reported that he deliberately did not mention where the sample came from. Because it was composed of finer particles meshit contained far fewer mafic particles with attached glass fragments than DOME-IH. John Baumgardner, who investigated the radiocarbon thing for a long time while he was a Creation Science Fellowship of New Mexico member. In contrast to Austin et al.
Any advocates of unidentified parent isotopes need to identify these isotopes, produce any evidence of their former existence, and derive the appropriate decay reactions for them.
The stirring on the mount
This is a science that is able to measure the radioactive decay rates of certain elements trapped in certain crystals zircons that formed inside mostly igneous rocks to obtain an absolute age. Plants take in as carbon dioxide, the C is the carbon atom, instead of the normal and stable C Point 1: Rather than invoking unproven miracles and plastering over the issue with 'God did it', scientists seek more profound, meaningful and useful natural answers. Rather than dealing with this evidence, Austin simply states that the origin of the excess 40Ar requires 'more study'. Of course, he and his assistants may have missed many of the xenocrysts if they were small. They then proceed to assault the validity of the K-Ar method.